

Daniel Negreanu Critiques Phil Hellmuth and Doyle Brunson's Poker Plays
Daniel Negreanu recently shared his insights on some notable poker hands from the new season of High Stakes Poker, offering critical analysis of plays by Phil Hellmuth and Doyle Brunson.
Negreanu criticized Phil Hellmuth's play, stating that Hellmuth sometimes plays terribly. He mentioned an incident where Hellmuth called Chino Riema the worst player in history for a standard play, highlighting the irony of Hellmuth's criticism.
Negreanu also discussed Doyle Brunson's declining play, attributing it to his age. He mentioned a hand where Brunson misread his cards and did not show them, and another where Brunson called a 4-bet with A8o, which Negreanu found interesting but not strategically sound.
Share this article
By
Argus RivenI've spent years at the tables — cash and tournaments — and just as long shaping poker copy behind the scenes: room reviews, bonus fine print, tournament notes. At PokerInsider I write the way I wish more sites would: clear structure, honest trade-offs, no hype. Whether you're new or already grinding, I care about what the offer actually costs you — rake, variance, and the fine print — and I treat responsible play as part of the job, not a footnote.
♠More in Live poker streaming


Bert Stevens' Poker Triumphs Highlighted in New PokerPRO Episode

