

Phil Galfond: Why Online Poker Isn't Rigged
Phil Galfond, known as PLO ninja, recently took to Twitter to address the persistent belief among some poker players that online poker is rigged. Galfond explained that major poker sites would never fix the action on their platforms because it would not benefit their bottom line.
Galfond mentioned that creating bigger pots artificially would cause players to go broke and leave, reducing liquidity for the poker site. He also noted that the increased cost of payment processing due to extra win/loss flow would outweigh the benefits of rigging. Galfond's detailed explanation provides a clear perspective on why online poker sites have no incentive to rig games.
Galfond's tweet sparked a detailed discussion about the ethics and financial implications of rigging online poker. He emphasized that while some companies might engage in shady practices, the potential risks and costs of rigging far outweigh any potential benefits. Galfond's insights offer a valuable perspective for players who have long suspected that online poker is rigged.
Share this article
By
Argus RivenI've spent years at the tables — cash and tournaments — and just as long shaping poker copy behind the scenes: room reviews, bonus fine print, tournament notes. At PokerInsider I write the way I wish more sites would: clear structure, honest trade-offs, no hype. Whether you're new or already grinding, I care about what the offer actually costs you — rake, variance, and the fine print — and I treat responsible play as part of the job, not a footnote.
♠More in Casino


West Memphis Welcomes New Animal Shelter with Casino Support

