

Is Betting on Underdogs Profitable? A Poker Pro's Experience
The average coefficient for positive participants in a weekly tournament increased to 4.4. This rise is notable as it reflects the strategies and outcomes of participants who bet on underdogs. One of the standout performers was Alexander, a 31-year-old professional poker player who won $50 in the tournament.
Alexander initially placed bets in a bookmaker's office to support his favorite teams. However, his experience with betting on the European Football Championship led to significant losses, prompting him to take a break. He then participated in a free tournament organized by GipsyTeam, which he found convenient for practicing without financial risk. Alexander spent about 15-20 minutes daily analyzing events for the tournament, focusing on football and avoiding low coefficients.
Betting margins are calculated to ensure bookmakers' profit, with formulas adjusting real coefficients. The margin for underdogs is typically higher than for favorites, leading to lower coefficients for underdogs. This bias affects the profitability of betting on underdogs, making it a challenging but potentially rewarding strategy.
Share this article
By
Argus RivenI've spent years at the tables — cash and tournaments — and just as long shaping poker copy behind the scenes: room reviews, bonus fine print, tournament notes. At PokerInsider I write the way I wish more sites would: clear structure, honest trade-offs, no hype. Whether you're new or already grinding, I care about what the offer actually costs you — rake, variance, and the fine print — and I treat responsible play as part of the job, not a footnote.
♠More in Casino


Fanatics Pulls the Plug on Utah Prediction Markets

