

PokerStars' Changes Spark Outrage Among Professional Players
PokerStars recently announced changes to their VIP program, which have been met with significant criticism from professional players. The changes, which include alterations to the Supernova Elite status and the reward system, have sparked outrage and accusations of deceit from the poker community.
Mike Gorodinsky was one of the first to criticize the announcement, calling it 'disgraceful' and accusing PokerStars of deceiving the public. He stated that the changes were made for profit and not for the benefit of the players, as the company claimed. Sam Greenwood also expressed skepticism about PokerStars' marketing claims and the impact of the changes on the game.
Dani 'Ansky' Stern published a detailed analysis of the changes on the 2+2 forum, highlighting several key points. He noted that the Supernova Elite status is a two-year program, allowing players to carry over their VIP status. Ansky also highlighted that the new reward system only offers a 30-cent increase in rakeback for ChromeStar status players, which he deemed insignificant. He expressed concern that the changes would negatively impact recreational players and the overall poker community, leading to a decrease in the quality of play and an increase in the number of regulars at lower limits.
Share this article
By
Argus RivenI've spent years at the tables — cash and tournaments — and just as long shaping poker copy behind the scenes: room reviews, bonus fine print, tournament notes. At PokerInsider I write the way I wish more sites would: clear structure, honest trade-offs, no hype. Whether you're new or already grinding, I care about what the offer actually costs you — rake, variance, and the fine print — and I treat responsible play as part of the job, not a footnote.
♠More in Online poker


Chino Rheem Wins 2026 PGT Sprint Kickoff Event

